Improve automatic post cleanup worker performances (#24785)

app/workers/scheduler/accounts_statuses_cleanup_scheduler.rb

@@ -38,17 +38,37 @@ class Scheduler::AccountsStatusesCleanupScheduler
     return if under_load?
 
     budget = compute_budget
-    first_policy_id = last_processed_id
+
+    # If the budget allows it, we want to consider all accounts with enabled
+    # auto cleanup at least once.
+    #
+    # We start from `first_policy_id` (the last processed id in the previous
+    # run) and process each policy until we loop to `first_policy_id`,
+    # recording into `affected_policies` any policy that caused posts to be
+    # deleted.
+    #
+    # After that, we set `full_iteration` to `false` and continue looping on
+    # policies from `affected_policies`.
+    first_policy_id   = last_processed_id || 0
+    first_iteration   = true
+    full_iteration    = true
+    affected_policies = []
 
     loop do
       num_processed_accounts = 0
 
-      scope = AccountStatusesCleanupPolicy.where(enabled: true)
+      scope = cleanup_policies(first_policy_id, affected_policies, first_iteration, full_iteration)
-      scope = scope.where(id: first_policy_id...) if first_policy_id.present?
       scope.find_each(order: :asc) do |policy|
         num_deleted = AccountStatusesCleanupService.new.call(policy, [budget, PER_ACCOUNT_BUDGET].min)
-        num_processed_accounts += 1 unless num_deleted.zero?
         budget -= num_deleted
+
+        unless num_deleted.zero?
+          num_processed_accounts += 1
+          affected_policies << policy.id if full_iteration
+        end
+
+        full_iteration = false if !first_iteration && policy.id >= first_policy_id
+
         if budget.zero?
           save_last_processed_id(policy.id)
           break
@@ -57,9 +77,9 @@ class Scheduler::AccountsStatusesCleanupScheduler
 
       # The idea here is to loop through all policies at least once until the budget is exhausted
       # and start back after the last processed account otherwise
-      break if budget.zero? || (num_processed_accounts.zero? && first_policy_id.nil?)
+      break if budget.zero? || (num_processed_accounts.zero? && !full_iteration)
 
-      first_policy_id = nil
+      first_iteration = false
     end
   end
 
@@ -76,12 +96,28 @@ class Scheduler::AccountsStatusesCleanupScheduler
 
   private
 
+  def cleanup_policies(first_policy_id, affected_policies, first_iteration, full_iteration)
+    scope = AccountStatusesCleanupPolicy.where(enabled: true)
+
+    if full_iteration
+      # If we are doing a full iteration, examine all policies we have not examined yet
+      if first_iteration
+        scope.where(id: first_policy_id...)
+      else
+        scope.where(id: ..first_policy_id).or(scope.where(id: affected_policies))
+      end
+    else
+      # Otherwise, examine only policies that previously yielded posts to delete
+      scope.where(id: affected_policies)
+    end
+  end
+
   def queue_under_load?(name, max_latency)
     Sidekiq::Queue.new(name).latency > max_latency
   end
 
   def last_processed_id
-    redis.get('account_statuses_cleanup_scheduler:last_policy_id')
+    redis.get('account_statuses_cleanup_scheduler:last_policy_id')&.to_i
   end
 
   def save_last_processed_id(id)

spec/workers/scheduler/accounts_statuses_cleanup_scheduler_spec.rb

@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ describe Scheduler::AccountsStatusesCleanupScheduler do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '#get_budget' do
+  describe '#compute_budget' do
     context 'on a single thread' do
       let(:process_set_stub) { [{ 'concurrency' => 1, 'queues' => %w(push default) }] }
 
@@ -130,6 +130,19 @@ describe Scheduler::AccountsStatusesCleanupScheduler do
           .and change { account3.statuses.count }
           .and change { account5.statuses.count }
       end
+
+      context 'when given a big budget' do
+        let(:process_set_stub) { [{ 'concurrency' => 400, 'queues' => %w(push default) }] }
+
+        before do
+          stub_const 'Scheduler::AccountsStatusesCleanupScheduler::MAX_BUDGET', 400
+        end
+
+        it 'correctly handles looping in a single run' do
+          expect(subject.compute_budget).to eq(400)
+          expect { subject.perform }.to change { Status.count }.by(-30)
+        end
+      end
     end
   end
 end