So if the control plane knows that something's broken about the node, it can
include problem(s) in MapResponse and "tailscale status" will show it.
(and GUIs in the future, as it's in ipnstate.Status/JSON)
This also bumps the MapRequest.Version, though it's not strictly
required. Doesn't hurt.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
And add health check errors to ipnstate.Status (tailscale status --json).
Updates #2746
Updates #2775
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
One of the consequences of the bind refactoring in 6f23087175
is that attempting to bind an IPv6 socket will always
result in c.pconn6.pconn being non-nil.
If the bind fails, it'll be set to a placeholder packet conn
that blocks forever.
As a result, we can always run ReceiveIPv6 and health check it.
This removes IPv4/IPv6 asymmetry and also will allow health checks
to detect any IPv6 receive func failures.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The old implementation knew too much about how wireguard-go worked.
As a result, it missed genuine problems that occurred due to unrelated bugs.
This fourth attempt to fix the health checks takes a black box approach.
A receive func is healthy if one (or both) of these conditions holds:
* It is currently running and blocked.
* It has been executed recently.
The second condition is required because receive functions
are not continuously executing. wireguard-go calls them and then
processes their results before calling them again.
There is a theoretical false positive if wireguard-go go takes
longer than one minute to process the results of a receive func execution.
If that happens, we have other problems.
Updates #1790
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
They were not doing their job.
They need yet another conceptual re-think.
Start by clearing the decks.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The existing implementation was completely, embarrassingly conceptually broken.
We aren't able to see whether wireguard-go's receive function goroutines
are running or not. All we can do is model that based on what we have done.
This commit fixes that model.
Fixes#1781
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Avery reported a sub-ms health transition from "receiveIPv4 not running" to "ok".
To avoid these transient false-positives, be more precise about
the expected lifetime of receive funcs. The problematic case is one in which
they were started but exited prior to a call to connBind.Close.
Explicitly represent started vs running state, taking care with the order of updates.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Brad Fitzpatrick
Josh Bleecher Snyder
David Anderson