With this change, all OSes can sort-of do split DNS, except that the
default upstream is hardcoded to 8.8.8.8 pending further plumbing.
Additionally, Windows 8-10 can do split DNS fully correctly, without
the 8.8.8.8 hack.
Part of #953.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
It seems that all the setups that support split DNS understand
this distinction, and it's an important one when translating
high-level configuration.
Part of #953.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Correctly reports that Win7 cannot do split DNS, and has a helper to
discover the "base" resolvers for the system.
Part of #953
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
OS implementations are going to support split DNS soon.
Until they're all in place, hardcode Primary=true to get
the old behavior.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
This is usually the same as the requested interface, but on some
unixes can vary based on device number allocation, and on Windows
it's the GUID instead of the pretty name, since everything relating
to configuration wants the GUID.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
wgengine/router.CallbackRouter needs to support both the Router
and OSConfigurator interfaces, so the setters can't both be called
Set.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
They need some rework to do the right thing, in the meantime the direct
and resolvconf managers will work out.
The resolved implementation was never selected due to control-side settings.
The networkmanager implementation mostly doesn't get selected due to
unforeseen interactions with `resolvconf` on many platforms.
Both implementations also need rework to support the various routing modes
they're capable of.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
It's only use to skip some optional initialization during cleanup,
but that work is very minor anyway, and about to change drastically.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
It's currently unused, and no longer makes sense with the upcoming
DNS infrastructure. Keep it in tailcfg for now, since we need protocol
compat for a bit longer.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
The resolver still only supports a single upstream config, and
ipn/wgengine still have to split up the DNS config, but this moves
closer to unifying the DNS configs.
As a handy side-effect of the refactor, IPv6 MagicDNS records exist
now.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
They're only used internally and in tests, and have surprising
semantics in that they only resolve MagicDNS names, not upstream
resolver queries.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Work around https://github.com/google/gvisor/issues/5732
by trying to read /proc/net/route with a larger bufsize if
it fails the first time.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
IPv6 Unique Local Addresses are sometimes used with Network
Prefix Translation to reach the Internet. In that respect
their use is similar to the private IPv4 address ranges
10/8, 172.16/12, and 192.168/16.
Treat them as sufficient for AnyInterfaceUp(), but specifically
exclude Tailscale's own IPv6 ULA prefix to avoid mistakenly
trying to bootstrap Tailscale using Tailscale.
This helps in supporting Google Cloud Run, where the addresses
are 169.254.8.1/32 and fddf:3978:feb1:d745::c001/128 on eth1.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
For discovery when an explicit hostname/IP is known. We'll still
also send it via control for finding peers by a list.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
The tstun packagen contains both constructors for generic tun
Devices, and a wrapper that provides additional functionality.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
David Anderson
Brad Fitzpatrick
Maisem Ali
Denton Gentry