a92b9647c5
This tries to generate traffic at a rate that will saturate the receiver, without overdoing it, even in the event of packet loss. It's unrealistically more aggressive than TCP (which will back off quickly in case of packet loss) but less silly than a blind test that just generates packets as fast as it can (which can cause all the CPU to be absorbed by the transmitter, giving an incorrect impression of how much capacity the total system has). Initial indications are that a syscall about every 10 packets (TCP bulk delivery) is roughly the same speed as sending every packet through a channel. A syscall per packet is about 5x-10x slower than that. The whole tailscale wireguard-go + magicsock + packet filter combination is about 4x slower again, which is better than I thought we'd do, but probably has room for improvement. Note that in "full" tailscale, there is also a tundev read/write for every packet, effectively doubling the syscall overhead per packet. Given these numbers, it seems like read/write syscalls are only 25-40% of the total CPU time used in tailscale proper, so we do have significant non-syscall optimization work to do too. Sample output: $ GOMAXPROCS=2 go test -bench . -benchtime 5s ./cmd/tailbench goos: linux goarch: amd64 pkg: tailscale.com/cmd/tailbench cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4785T CPU @ 2.20GHz BenchmarkTrivialNoAlloc/32-2 56340248 93.85 ns/op 340.98 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkTrivialNoAlloc/124-2 57527490 99.27 ns/op 1249.10 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkTrivialNoAlloc/1024-2 52537773 111.3 ns/op 9200.39 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkTrivial/32-2 41878063 135.6 ns/op 236.04 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkTrivial/124-2 41270439 138.4 ns/op 896.02 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkTrivial/1024-2 36337252 154.3 ns/op 6635.30 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkBlockingChannel/32-2 12171654 494.3 ns/op 64.74 MB/s 0 %lost 1791 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkBlockingChannel/124-2 12149956 507.8 ns/op 244.17 MB/s 0 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op BenchmarkBlockingChannel/1024-2 11034754 528.8 ns/op 1936.42 MB/s 0 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op BenchmarkNonlockingChannel/32-2 8960622 2195 ns/op 14.58 MB/s 8.825 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op BenchmarkNonlockingChannel/124-2 3014614 2224 ns/op 55.75 MB/s 11.18 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op BenchmarkNonlockingChannel/1024-2 3234915 1688 ns/op 606.53 MB/s 3.765 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op BenchmarkDoubleChannel/32-2 8457559 764.1 ns/op 41.88 MB/s 5.945 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op BenchmarkDoubleChannel/124-2 5497726 1030 ns/op 120.38 MB/s 12.14 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op BenchmarkDoubleChannel/1024-2 7985656 1360 ns/op 752.86 MB/s 13.57 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op BenchmarkUDP/32-2 1652134 3695 ns/op 8.66 MB/s 0 %lost 176 B/op 3 allocs/op BenchmarkUDP/124-2 1621024 3765 ns/op 32.94 MB/s 0 %lost 176 B/op 3 allocs/op BenchmarkUDP/1024-2 1553750 3825 ns/op 267.72 MB/s 0 %lost 176 B/op 3 allocs/op BenchmarkTCP/32-2 11056336 503.2 ns/op 63.60 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkTCP/124-2 11074869 533.7 ns/op 232.32 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkTCP/1024-2 8934968 671.4 ns/op 1525.20 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkWireGuardTest/32-2 1403702 4547 ns/op 7.04 MB/s 14.37 %lost 467 B/op 3 allocs/op BenchmarkWireGuardTest/124-2 780645 7927 ns/op 15.64 MB/s 1.537 %lost 420 B/op 3 allocs/op BenchmarkWireGuardTest/1024-2 512671 11791 ns/op 86.85 MB/s 0.5206 %lost 411 B/op 3 allocs/op PASS ok tailscale.com/wgengine/bench 195.724s Updates #414. Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.github | ||
atomicfile | ||
client/tailscale | ||
cmd | ||
control/controlclient | ||
derp | ||
disco | ||
health | ||
internal | ||
ipn | ||
log | ||
logpolicy | ||
logtail | ||
metrics | ||
net | ||
paths | ||
portlist | ||
safesocket | ||
scripts | ||
smallzstd | ||
syncs | ||
tailcfg | ||
tempfork | ||
tsconst | ||
tstest | ||
tstime | ||
tsweb | ||
types | ||
util | ||
version | ||
wgengine | ||
.gitattributes | ||
.gitignore | ||
AUTHORS | ||
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md | ||
Dockerfile | ||
LICENSE | ||
Makefile | ||
PATENTS | ||
README.md | ||
SECURITY.md | ||
VERSION.txt | ||
api.md | ||
build_dist.sh | ||
build_docker.sh | ||
go.mod | ||
go.sum | ||
shell.nix |
README.md
Tailscale
Private WireGuard® networks made easy
Overview
This repository contains all the open source Tailscale client code and
the tailscaled
daemon and tailscale
CLI tool. The tailscaled
daemon runs primarily on Linux; it also works to varying degrees on
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Darwin, and Windows.
The Android app is at https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale-android
Using
We serve packages for a variety of distros at https://pkgs.tailscale.com .
Other clients
The macOS, iOS, and Windows clients use the code in this repository but additionally include small GUI wrappers that are not open source.
Building
go install tailscale.com/cmd/tailscale{,d}
If you're packaging Tailscale for distribution, use build_dist.sh
instead, to burn commit IDs and version info into the binaries:
./build_dist.sh tailscale.com/cmd/tailscale
./build_dist.sh tailscale.com/cmd/tailscaled
If your distro has conventions that preclude the use of
build_dist.sh
, please do the equivalent of what it does in your
distro's way, so that bug reports contain useful version information.
We only guarantee to support the latest Go release and any Go beta or release candidate builds (currently Go 1.16) in module mode. It might work in earlier Go versions or in GOPATH mode, but we're making no effort to keep those working.
Bugs
Please file any issues about this code or the hosted service on the issue tracker.
Contributing
PRs welcome! But please file bugs. Commit messages should reference bugs.
We require Developer Certificate of
Origin
Signed-off-by
lines in commits.
About Us
Tailscale is primarily developed by the people at https://github.com/orgs/tailscale/people. For other contributors, see:
- https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/graphs/contributors
- https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale-android/graphs/contributors
Legal
WireGuard is a registered trademark of Jason A. Donenfeld.